The title Expelled resonates not only with the content of the works but also with the fates of the two artists. Both were exiled from the places they considered home, where they were born, grew up, and planned to continue living and working. The terrible year of 2022 made them refugees and exiles. Kirill Fadeev was forced to flee Ukraine due to the Russian military invasion, and Igor Sychev had to leave Russia to escape the war declared on LGBTQ+ culture. Right now, as I write this essay, bombs are exploding in Ukrainian cities, and in Moscow, raids are being conducted at the Garage Museum of Contemporary Art. Someone reported that the museum staff had hidden queer literature in the archives.
Both artists found their new home in Portugal. At the beginning of 2022, these artists could not have imagined that they would soon, involuntarily, become part of the absolute trend in the development of contemporary art. The Venice Biennale 2024 is dedicated to the art of foreign artists and queer identities. The authors of this exhibition embody both these personas. These remarkably different artists are strikingly similar. Their similarity is largely due to both having an academic art education, which pushes them towards a dialogue with aesthetic traditions and codes. Kirill and Igor openly exploit the aesthetics of socialist realism, taking the clichés of this artistic style to the point of absurdity and blatant irony.
In the aesthetics of socialist realism, the male body was one of the main heroes, symbolizing revolution, industrialization, the working class, achievements, heroism, and the building of communism. The semi-naked male body was a staple of Soviet artistic propaganda for most of the USSR’s existence. However, there was occasionally a subtle emotional aestheticization of the male body in the work of Soviet artists, as seen in the works of Alexander Deyneka. The state-sponsored promotion of physical culture and the idealized human form provided a socially acceptable framework through which artists could explore themes of physical beauty and eroticism, albeit indirectly.
This context allowed artists like Deyneka to celebrate the male body without overtly contravening societal norms. This insight allows us to see how the internal conflict in the work of two artists born in the USSR is realized. We see a liberation from the shackles of the homophobic reality of the USSR through the artistic analysis of the aesthetics of socialist realism and the parodying of Soviet artistic practices. This method of liberation through scandal and parody is not new to art and has roots in the aesthetics of carnivalization. However, queer art explores this method particularly meticulously.
In 2022, a project by Portuguese artists João Pedro Vale and Nuno Alexandre Ferreira, titled 1983, emerged, referring to a time when Europe was as homophobic as Russia and Ukraine are now. “1983 is also the year when the first news about AIDS reaches Portugal. An impending global crisis would reveal – just as today the climate emergency or COVID – the vulnerability of life, and of our human freedoms. AIDS also revealed the structural homophobia behind the politicians’ odious stalling in implementing essential precautionary measures, and which set in motion a wave of militant resistance movements that today, 40 years later, have led to significant changes in the way people engage in anti-racist or feminist rights protest, as well as against heteronormative totalitarianisms, together playing decisive roles in the struggle against the fresh wave of neofascist populism (from Trump to Bolsonaro)” – says Dr. Prof. Alexander Melo regarding the project 1983.
Like the authors of the exhibition Expelled, the Portuguese artists used scandalous and kitsch images as a way to objectify the great internal work that every queer person undergoes, desiring to defend their right to be different, be not of this world in the world of heteronormative totalitarianisms.
The relationship between totalitarianism and homosexuality warrants separate discussion due to its typically complex nature. If we were to imagine a totalitarian mindset embodied in a single individual, we might conclude that this person would require psychological assistance. The state of such an individual could be described as a schizotypal disorder, characterized by an intense love and hatred for the same object.
The European audience is well-acquainted with the flourishing of homoeroticism in Nazi Germany up until the late 1930s. However, not everyone is aware of a similar period of fascination with the male body in Soviet art during the same decade. Earlier, I mentioned Alexander Deyneka; here, I will provide examples of his works in comparison with those of Kirill Fadeyev and Igor Sychev. Researchers of gay art note (and members of the gay community are well aware) that the space of the public restroom is semantically significant in gay culture.
In times of repression, the toilet remains a space for personal freedom. As Professor Melo states, "Why public urinals become places rife with homosexual activity is historically what happens when political repression meets moral transgression." By the principle of contiguity, artistic plots can unfold in the space of a shower room, where the contact of naked bodies of the same sex does not face social condemnation. This is precisely the plot we see in the works After the Battle and After the Shower.
Gay art shows a similarly strong interest in the theme of manual labor, which requires the display of male strength and the potential of the male body. Images of physical labor form complex yet enduring associations with images of roughness and dominance, leading us into another significant theme in gay art.
In conclusion, I would like to express my profound gratitude to The Late Birds board and its founder Carlos Sanches Ruivo and his husband, Heber Charles, for their philanthropic approach, altruism, and fervent support of this project. I am also deeply thankful to Dr. Luis U. Afonso, Dr. Alexandra Fernandes, and Dr. Alexandre Melo for their support and valuable insights. Additionally, I extend my sincere thanks to the artists, Kirill and Igor, for their courage and trust in such a complex political context.
Mikhail Osadchiy
CONTACT US